![]() |
|
Scarlett Chiu |
|
|
For my Ph. D. I studied pottery remains excavated from the Lapita Site 13 (WKO013A, ca. 1100-800 B.C.) of Koné, New Caledonia. The significance of the Lapita Site 13 project was framed specifically in terms of the prehistory of Southwest Pacific. However, it became clear that its questions are of general theoretical interest for the study of immigration, involving colonization strategy, kin-group affiliation and identification, the maintenance and/or disappearance of socio-economic exchange networks, and the intensification and specialization of local production. These general theoretical topics form the basis of the development and growth of socio-economic complexity amongst the early populations of the Pacific. The socio-economic implications of the rapid abandonment of such labor-intensive dentate-stamped technique after initial settlement were also considered and put into the context of competing theories about the importance of dentate-stamped Lapita pottery in these early societies. Thus an interpretation of Lapita pottery and its roles in social differentiation in a possible house society that was constantly expanding into new islands of the Pacific is proposed. A ceramic assemblage from Site 13A of Koné, New Caledonia is examined and compared with numerous ethnographic studies of Oceanic, Southeast Asian societies, and their materialized house/clan symbols. Lapita pottery is seen as an authentic item associated with founding ancestors to express a house’s social, economic, political, and spiritual status, and to further generate not only social identity, but also power and social inequality. As long as these Lapita pots were decorated with dentate-stamps, as long as they carried however simplified version of human faces, they were reproduced for the social purpose of passing on the tradition, of providing chances for their owners to present their profound knowledge and great grasps of their family histories, of claiming titles and resources that are rightfully theirs, thus, of constructing a path to spiritual and political power. It has been argued the value of a material symbol, as an inalienable possession, through its real or imagined path to ancestors and thus rights over material and immaterial wealth, accumulates power to express over time. Lapita pottery, and its social roles in Lapita societies, are both historically made, and constitute history in the making. I completed my M.A. in the Department of Anthropology at the University of California, Berkeley, and my B.A. in the Department of Anthropology at the National Taiwan University. I have participated in several archaeological projects on various Pacific islands including Niou-Chio-Tsi (Tainan, Taiwan); Shih-Shen-Hung, Yuan-Shan, Chi-Shan-Yen, and He-Dien-Chung IV (Taipei, Taiwan); Kahikinui District (Maui, Hawaii); Lapita Site 13 (Koné, New Caledonia); and Tongaleleka and ‘Uiha (Ha'apai Islands, Kingdom of Tonga). |
|
|
Publications Chiu,
S. 2004. Meanings of a Lapita face: materialized social memory in ancient
house societies. Paper in preparation. Chiu,
S. 2002. Compositional analysis of Lapita pottery and related wares from
WKO013A, Koné, New Caledonia. Paper presented at the 17th Congress
of Indo-Pacific Prehistory Association, Taipei, Taiwan, Sept. 2002. |
|